<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Putting a Button on Top of Another Button is a Bad Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swedishfika.com/2009/11/07/why-putting-a-button-on-top-of-another-button-is-a-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swedishfika.com/2009/11/07/why-putting-a-button-on-top-of-another-button-is-a-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:58:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.swedishfika.com/2009/11/07/why-putting-a-button-on-top-of-another-button-is-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-8700</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swedishfika.com/?p=638#comment-8700</guid>
		<description>Yeah, now that you mention it I also remember that old good Firefox 1.0 - feature. Wasn&#039;t it kind of easier to close multiple tabs by just clicking the same button at the same location? I think so. Though, I remember it wasn&#039;t  that logic to have the button placed far out to the right (it was there it was placed right?), perhaps that&#039;s why they now have a close button on each tab just as IE7+, Safari and Chrome?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, now that you mention it I also remember that old good Firefox 1.0 &#8211; feature. Wasn&#8217;t it kind of easier to close multiple tabs by just clicking the same button at the same location? I think so. Though, I remember it wasn&#8217;t  that logic to have the button placed far out to the right (it was there it was placed right?), perhaps that&#8217;s why they now have a close button on each tab just as IE7+, Safari and Chrome?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoffer Möller</title>
		<link>http://www.swedishfika.com/2009/11/07/why-putting-a-button-on-top-of-another-button-is-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-8680</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoffer Möller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swedishfika.com/?p=638#comment-8680</guid>
		<description>I live by the keyboard so this does not effect me much. However, the close button on EVERY tab on EVERY application is a bit annoying when you inevitably click it once in a while.

I think there is something to be said for the way Firefox 1.0 handled it with a single close-tab button over to the right.

And since I apparently have nothing else to do in the middle of the night I&#039;d like to point to some interesting resources.

For remote filesystem access I love MacFUSE + sshfs at: http://code.google.com/p/macfuse/

And Apple have comprehensiv guidelines for application development (that even Apple don&#039;t follow) at: http://bit.ly/8r7Frj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live by the keyboard so this does not effect me much. However, the close button on EVERY tab on EVERY application is a bit annoying when you inevitably click it once in a while.</p>
<p>I think there is something to be said for the way Firefox 1.0 handled it with a single close-tab button over to the right.</p>
<p>And since I apparently have nothing else to do in the middle of the night I&#8217;d like to point to some interesting resources.</p>
<p>For remote filesystem access I love MacFUSE + sshfs at: <a href="http://code.google.com/p/macfuse/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/macfuse/</a></p>
<p>And Apple have comprehensiv guidelines for application development (that even Apple don&#8217;t follow) at: <a href="http://bit.ly/8r7Frj" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8r7Frj</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
